How A Busybody College Instructor Got Herself Banned From McDonald’s

Posted in: regulation |

I came across this article that I thought raised several issues. First, the story.

It seems that Chandler, Arizona resident Erin Carr Jordan was at her local McDonald’s with her kids when she took a closer look at the play space in the restaurant. To her surprise, she found it disgusting (and why wouldn’t it be that way? Kids were crawling all over it!) and subsequently complained to the manager. During ensuing visits she found the play space still didn’t meet her standards.

So, what did she do when faced with this potential bubonic plague of a threat to civilization?

  • Did she simply decide to not patronize the offending McDonald’s and take her kids to a local park? I mean, there are no germs in a public park, right?
  • Did she write a letter to the management, perhaps informing them why she no longer planned to patronize their establishment? Unlike government monopolies, such as the post office or the DMV (and even educational institutions, in some cases), private companies need business to survive and generally respond well to reasonable (key word there) complaints.

Of course not!

Instead, she actually had samples taken, which were then analyzed by a lab. The result? Horrors! All kinds of pathogens were found! She then went on a crusade, complaining to the manager, bothering other parents in the McDonald’s about her findings, and just made such a nuisance of herself that her local McDonald’s actually banned her from their restaurants. Who would have thought that was possible?

I think this story nicely illustrates some real differences in how conservative/libertarians view the world vs lefty progressive types. To wit:

  • If you find something in a restaurant you don’t like, simply stop doing there? If you’re really gung ho, write a letter saying why you are no longer visiting the premises. Why go on a regulatory crusade?
  • Isn’t she interested in finding out how many plagues can be linked back to McDonald’s playgrounds? I have a guess at this number – 0.
  • Why isn’t she interested in the pathogen count in public playgrounds? Or at public libraries? Why pick on McDonald’s?
  • For that matter, why not do a check for pathogens on kids themselves? Is she not aware how unhygienic they are? They pick their nose and eat it. They eat glue. They drink from dog bowls, for crying out loud. Maybe we should get “at the root causes” and mandate that all kids should be encased, bubble boy like, in plastic?
  • Isn’t she slightly worried that if she gets her wish and some new regularity framework is set up, that many restaurants, including McDonald’s, might decide that having a play area is just not worth the bother?

 

As a conservative/libertarian type I accept that fact that the world is not perfect. However, I know that any attempts to fix that come with costs that must always be weighed. It seems to be that the Erin Carr Jordan’s of the world have their risk/cost meters seriously out of adjustment. What do you think the pathogen count would be if you did a count in her fridge?

What do you think? Would you be at all surprised if I told you that Erin Carr Jordan was a college instructor? Aren’t you kind of impressed that she was banned (I LOVE that part, actually, makes me want to buy a Big Mac in solidarity)? What do you think it reveals about the progressive mindset?

Enhanced by Zemanta

We don’t have to surrender to public-sector unions

Posted in: Government |

This article by Neil Reynolds looks at the history of public sector unions and why they’re a problem. In my mind, I’ve come to the conclusion that in most cases public sector unions simply shouldn’t exist. They are fundamentally different from private sector unions for two reasons:

  1. Unlike a private company, the government has no incentive to keep costs down. It can’t go out of business. There is no bottom line for a government. It can agree to almost anything and simply raise taxes or add on more debt.
  2. Public union members are also voters. When a government gives rich contracts to public sector unions it is literally buying votes. This is a huge conflict of interest that is simply wrong.

All over the western world, public sector pay and benefits are far more lavish than their private sector counterparts. In order to bring things into line public sector wages and benefits should be tied to whatever the going rate is in the private sector. If we don’t want to wind up like Greece, I don’t see any other way. Here’s the article:

We don’t have to surrender to public-sector unions

Enhanced by Zemanta